The Open Door Web Site
HOME PAGE BIOLOGY CHEMISTRY PHYSICS ELECTRONICS HISTORY HISTORY of SCI & TECH MATH STUDIES LEARN FRENCH STUDY GUIDE PHOTO GALLERY
ATOMIC and NUCLEAR ELECTRICITY and MAGNETISM MEASUREMENTS MECHANICS OPTICS PRACTICAL WORK QUESTIONS RELATIVITY THERMAL PHYSICS WAVES
PRACTICAL WORK
Google
Custom Search
Writing an Experiment Report
What follows is a general guide as to how to present a report on a scientific investigation.
If you are a school or college student, you might find your teachers/professors have other ideas... check with them before starting work; this writer accepts no responsibility for low grades!
 
Title Introduction Hypothesis Diagram Method Results Theory Conclusions
Title or Aim of the Experiment
The title must state clearly the aim of the experiment; it must tell the reader what you are trying to prove or measure.
For example, “Ohm’s Law” is not a suitable title for an experiment report, whereas, “Experiment to see if a piece of iron wire obeys Ohm’s Law” could be a suitable title.
 
Similarly, “Relative Density” is not a suitable title but “Experiment to measure the Relative Density of some common substances” is a suitable title.
 
Introduction
If the experiment is designed to verify a law, state the law in the introduction.
The introduction can also include such ideas as why the results/conclusions of the experiment are important in every-day life, in industry etc. (it might even include a little historical background, but don't overdo it).
Hypothesis
Before starting your investigation you usually have some idea of what you expect the results will show.
The hypothesis is basically a statement of what you are expecting.
 For example, if you are trying to show how two variables are related, state the expected relation and try to give an explanation of your choice.
When Newton was thinking about gravitation, he assumed that the strength of the force of gravity would become weaker as one moved further from the body causing the field.
He suggested that the relation between force and distance might involve the inverse of the distance squared and to defend this choice he pointed out that the surface area of a sphere depends on the square of its radius. Various observations/measurements then confirmed this suggestion.
 
Diagram
In most cases a labeled diagram and/or photographs of the apparatus can be useful.
Every electrical experiment report must include a circuit diagram.
If diagrams are drawn by hand, I suggest a sharp pencil and a ruler.
If you use a computer, learn how to make the best use of your drawing program. Badly drawn computer diagrams are, in this writer's humble opinion, worse than a quick sketch using pencil and ruler.
 
Method
The method section should give enough detail to enable another experimenter to repeat the experiment to see if he/she agrees with your results/conclusions. The method should include
- a description of the apparatus used
- what measurements you made (if possible, in the order you made them)
- what precautions you took to ensure the best accuracy possible
- a mention of any unexpected difficulties (and how you overcame them)
 
Results
You should record all the measurements made during the experiment along with some indication of the uncertainty of each measurement.
Whenever possible, present the results in the form of a table.
 
Theory
This section should include any information which might help the reader to understand how you used your measurements to reach the aim mentioned in the title.
For example, in one experiment, designed to measure the relative density of a substance, the actual measurements made are two distances.
The theory section of a report on such an experiment must include a clear explanation of how these two distances are related to the relative density of the substance being measured.
 
Conclusions
Every experiment report must have a conclusion!
If your aim was to verify a law, state whether you have verified the law or not. If the aim was to measure a particular quantity (e.g. relative density as mentioned above), give the final measured value of the quantity in the conclusion.
In the case of an experiment designed to measure some well known physical constant you should attempt to explain any difference between your result and the accepted result.
For example, if you find g=9.5ms-2, you should try to think of the most likely cause(s) of this obvious error.
If the experiment results were in some way unsatisfactory, try to suggest how the investigation might be improved in order to improve accuracy of measurements or range of data obtained.
This evaluation section should include comments on the apparatus used and the method employed.
 
SITE MAP
WHAT'S NEW
ABOUT
PRIVACY
COPYRIGHT
SPONSORSHIP
DONATIONS
ADVERTISING
 

© The Open Door Team
2016
Any questions or
problems regarding
this site should be
addressed to
the webmaster

© David Hoult 2017

Hosted By
Web Hosting by HostCentric

 
SiteLock
 
 
Practicals Index Page